Johan Nikles vs Benedikt Szerencsits Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Jul at 12:52 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Nikles vs B. Szerencsits

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nikles 1 - 0 Szerencsits
They have played 2 sets in total, with Johan Nikles winning 2 and Benedikt Szerencsits winning 0. The last match between Johan Nikles and Benedikt Szerencsits was at the M25 Ollersbach, 23-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Johan Nikles getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nikles | 1 |
| Szerencsits | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Ollersbach(07-23-25)
J. Nikles vs B. Szerencsits H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $11,650 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.65% (322-227) | Career Total W/L | 36.36% (16-28) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Nikles vs B. Szerencsits Match Preview:
- How does Nikles compare to Szerencsits in terms of second serve performance recently? Nikles has been slightly superior with a 43.81% winning rate compared to Szerencsits' 38.78%.
- Analyzing return game stats, Nikles also holds an advantage, capturing 48.86% of the opponent's second serve points versus Szerencsits' 30.77%.
- When facing first serve returns, Nikles again surpasses Szerencsits by winning 32.99% against 27.94%, hinting who might be favored overall.
- Szerencsits exhibits notable efficiency under pressure, saving 68.75% of breakpoints compared to Nikles' 50.64%.
- Examining performance over the past year, Nikles has secured a higher match win percentage (59.26%) than Szerencsits (42.31%).
- Nikles excels on Hard courts, maintaining a 62% career win rate, while Szerencsits prefers Clay surfaces with a 42% win rate.
- In terms of player levels, both predominantly compete in Futures/ITF tournaments, with Nikles winning 60.78% and Szerencsits at 42.31%.
- What about their history against stronger opponents? Nikles’ opponents have an average rank of 328.76, whereas Szerencsits' average opponent rank is notably lower at 65.19.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, both Nikles and Szerencsits show resilience, with win rates of 56% and 57%, respectively.
- Concerning break point opportunities, Nikles has a noticeable conversion rate at 42.22%, significantly higher compared to Szerencsits' 25%, indicating a critical edge in close games.
Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):
The comparative analysis reveals Nikles as a formidable player on hard courts, with superior service and return statistics. His effective break point conversion and better career performance provide a compelling case for his current strength.
While Szerencsits has demonstrated impressive break point defense and solid performance against higher-ranked opponents, his overall win rate and lack of success on faster surfaces could hinder his chances against Nikles.
Taking into account these factors, Nikles seems more likely to win the upcoming match, given his adept handling of various critical match situations and a higher propensity to capitalize on opponents' weaknesses.
Johan Nikles vs Benedikt Szerencsits Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Nikles vs B. Szerencsits H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:9:51 | Average Match Time | 1:9:51 |
| 55% (27/49) | 1st Serve % | 58% (30/52) |
| 81% (22/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (18/30) |
| 68% (15/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (12/22) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (22/52) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Nikles Recent Matches Played
B. Szerencsits Recent Matches Played

J. Nikles vs B. Szerencsits Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.65% (322/227) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.36% (16/28) |
| 56.97% (715/540) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.39% (39/60) |
| 53.00% (6112/5419) | Games Win/Loss | 45.55% (440/526) |
| 62.99% (97/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 59.29% (217/149) | Clay Win/Loss | 39.02% (16/25) |
| 27.59% (8/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 349 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1160 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 1:24:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 508.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 82.77 |
| 66% (20755/31415) | 1st Serve % | 61% (276/454) |
| 61% (12621/20755) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (172/276) |
| 48% (5092/10660) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (88/178) |
| 46% (1820/3941) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (9/23) |
| 45% (14360/31791) | Return Points Win % | 32% (121/382) |
| 33.33% (4/8) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49.41% (42/43) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 61.06% (276/176) | Futures W/L | 37.21% (16/27) |
| 59% (318/541) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (16/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (65/118) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 83% (5/6) |
| 55% (89/163) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 87% (307/267) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (19/14) |
| 13% (307/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 26% (19/5) |
| 23% (242/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (25/2) |